Skip to main content

Waiting for the End of the World... Right Now in the Anthropocene Epoch


The future is bleak my friends... In case you were not already aware, even though we all know that each and everyone one of us has a very limited time span here in this life on earth, so too does humanity. Lifeour very existenceis something we all like to take for granted as a species, but I would simply like to put some perspective on things. If you are able to read this article, you must therefore also be a primateit almost goes without saying. I say almost because there are a good number of unscientifically-minded people who would argue against evolution, against science, and even against all of the archaeological and anthropological evidence that shows that we are primates. It is estimated that there is an astonishing 38% of people in the United Stateslesser in Canada, 21%who believe that God recently put us on earth some time in the past 10,000, howeverthankfully!the majority of us know better (1). My intention is certainly not to bust your bubble if you belong to this ‘Young Earth’ creationists’ camp. (But, if you do believe in such tales, then you might want to take a a gander at the image below to see where your thick primate skull fits in as far as the primate scheme of things is concerned.) Whether your skin colour is very pale or very dark or anywhere in between, whether you live in some isolated Inuit Arctic community, a rural African village in Angola, or even in a remote island in the South Pacific, or right here in downtown Ottawa as I do, regardless, it does not matter because we are all humanand humans are primates. And, to be even more specific, humans are part of the primate grouping called the Great Apes, named for our large bodies and larger brains, and we share this category with the orangutans, gorillas, and chimpanzees. (If Adam and Eve and a mythical garden of Eden come to mind, dear reader, you might want to rethink your worldview.) Since a giant meteorite strike helped wipe out the dinosaurs 65 million years ago, we presently find ourselves to be living in a very significant age. We live in a time when the natural world is being destroyed by humans, and we can bear witness to the greatest mass extinction that has occurred since the dinosaurs have disappeared.


Above: A skull of Homo erectus, a direct ancestor to later hominins such as Homo neanderthalensis and Homo sapiens among others. Homo erectus existed over one million years ago and maybe even finds its origins as far back as over two million years ago.

The closest relative of the modern human species, Homo sapiens, is the chimpanzee. In addition to all the obvious physical similarities and types of behaviour we share with chimps, there is now also DNA evidence that confirms humans and chimps diverged from a common ancestor some time between 8 and 6 million years ago, and scientists estimate there is only a 1.2 percent genetic difference between modern humans and chimps when comparing the differences between our genetic codes (2). Going back even more in our family tree (pun intended), Notharctus is the scientific name given to one of the first modern primate—about 40 cm long, it had opposable thumbs and stereo vision to help them move around and find food in the three-dimensional world of the trees where they livedand you may be surprised to learn that Notharctus was strikingly similar to today’s lemurs and tarsiers. Therefore, looking at these animals now, it is almost like travelling back and catching a glimpse of our earliest ancestors that lived in the trees 50 million years ago during the Eocene Epoch (which lasted from 56 to 33.9 million years ago), when these primates lived in North America and Europe. (It is certainly too much for the Young Earth creationists to fathom... Adam and Eve certainly makes more sense to them. And, as for the conspiracy theorists, they prefer alien intervention scenarios in order to make sense of human evolution.)

Above: Tarsier tarsius (from North Sulawesi, Indonesia). Below: Lemur catta (from Ranomafana National Park, Madagascar). 


Above:  Chimpanzee, the closest relative of the modern human species, Homo sapiensBelow: Forensic reconstruction of Homo habilis, , exhibit in LWL-Museum für Archäologie, Herne, Germany (2007 photograph). Homo habilis is a proposed archaic species of Homo, which lived between roughly 2.1 and 1.5 million years ago.


Why bring up the subject of primates? Where am I going with all this? Well, in case you live in a bubble (because FB is your only news source), then I would like to point out that scientists have been warning us for years that animals such as orangutans and chimpanzees are species that are in danger of being wiped out in an imminent mass extinction of primates.


“Primate species including chimpanzees and orangutans are on the brink of extinction, and scientists fear that without a concerted global effort they will soon be gone for good. An international group of primate experts has called for urgent action after finding parts of the world home to the most monkeys, lemurs and apes will see those populations pushed to breaking point by the end of the century. Just four countries harbour two thirds of all primate speciesBrazil, Madagascar, Indonesia and the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC)and 60 per cent of those species are threatened with extinction. Among them are some of our closest relatives, including chimpanzees, orangutans and lowland gorillas.”
Josh Gabbatiss, Science correspondent for The Independent (3).

Sadly, humansas stewards of the earthare directly responsible for this terrible state of affairs. Over time, a radical separation has been ‘invented’ by ‘civilized’ humans to remove ourselves from the rest of the assemblage of life on this planet and the natural scheme of things. With more than half of the world’s population now living in urban areas, because of the overexploitation of natural resources, overpopulation, encroaching urbanization and habitat destruction, to put is bluntly, humans are royally effing it up. We have had such an impact on our planet’s capacity to sustain life on it that scientists usually refer to this geological time period as the Anthropocene Epoch, which the Encyclopaedia Britannica (4) defines as follows:

“Anthropocene Epoch, unofficial interval of geologic time, making up the third worldwide division of the Quaternary Period (2.6 million years ago to the present), characterized as the time in which the collective activities of human beings (Homo sapiens) began to substantially alter Earth's surface, atmosphere, oceans, and systems of nutrient cycling. A growing group of scientists argue that the Anthropocene Epoch should follow the Holocene Epoch (11,700 years ago to the present) and begin in the year 1950. The name Anthropocene is derived from Greek and means the “recent age of man.”

To give but a few examples of how humans are having a significant negative impact on earth (the only planet that can support life!), let’s mention those that stand out the most, such as

INDUSTRY, POLLUTION, AND GLOBAL WARMING


Levels of air pollution rose during the Industrial Revolution, sparking the first modern environmental laws to be passed in the mid-19th century. All of the industrial chemicals in use today, ones that are central to the world economy are produced by the chemical industry. Converting raw materials (such as oil, natural gas, water, air, and other natural resources like metals and minerals) into more than 70,000 different products.

...NUCLEAR POWER, AND NUCLEAR WEAPONS


No larger than traditional bombs, a nuclear device can devastate an entire city by blast, fire, and radiation. As weapons of mass destruction, the proliferation of nuclear weapons in today’s world is often a focus of international relations policy. In regards to the ongoing debate about nuclear power, proponents such as the World Nuclear Association and Environmentalists for Nuclear Energy, contend that nuclear power is a safe, sustainable energy source that reduces carbon emissions, but opposing groups such as Greenpeace and NIRS contend that nuclear power poses many threats to people and the environment. If recent history can serve as a witness, catastrophic nuclear accidents such as the one that occurred at Chernobyl accident, in northern Ukrainian Soviet Socialist Republic, Soviet Union on 26 April 1986, as well as the more recent Fukushima Daiichi nuclear disaster in Japan in 2011, are two good examples of how humans in the Holocene Epoch are hellbent on killing the environment.

...THE PLASTIC INDUSTRY, NON-BIODEGRADABLE WASTE


As journalist Emanuela Campanella reports (5): “According to Over the last 10 years, we have produced more plastic than all of the 20th century. [...] Every year, about 8-million tons of plastic ends up in our oceans, which is equal to five bags filled with plastic going along every foot of coastline in the world, according to Plastic Oceans, a non-profit organization. By 2025, they estimate the annual input will be about twice that.”

...DEFORESTATION, ENCROACHING URBANIZATION AND HABITAT DESTRUCTION


...HUMAN CITIES


Not much greenery can be seen when looking at the Toronto skyline. As Hans Vestberg (CEO, Verizon Communications), writes (6): “As recent reports from the International Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) and the US government make clear, climate change and related environmental challenges are proceeding even faster than expected, with potentially grave consequences for humanity, natural habitats, and the global economy. What makes the challenge even more daunting is the fact that the world population (and therefore the demand for energy and natural resources) is poised to expand significantly over the remainder of this century, reaching 9.8 billion human beings by 2050 and 11.2 billion by 2100.”

...AND WE CAN’T FORGET OIL REFINERIES, OILS SANDS, AND PIPELINES


Oil sands, Fort McMurray, Alberta. 

AND SADDEST OF ALL, ANIMALS EATEN INTO EXTINCTION

Mandril with child.


As Damian Carrington (The Guardian) reports (7):Hundreds of mammal speciesfrom chimpanzees to hippos to batsare being eaten into extinction by people, according to the first global assessment of the impact of human hunting. Bushmeat has long been a traditional source of food for many rural people, but as roads have been driven into remote areas, large-scale commercial hunting is leaving forests and other habitats devoid of wildlife. The scientists behind the new analysis warned that, without action, the wiping out of these species could lead to the collapse of the food security of hundreds of millions of people reliant on bushmeat for survival. The work comes against the backdrop of the natural world undergoing the greatest mass extinction since a giant meteorite strike wiped out the dinosaurs 65m years ago, with species vanishing far more rapidly than the long term rate, driven by the destruction and invasion of wild areas by humans and their livestock and hunting.”

*   *   *

In considering the earliest point to mark the beginning of a so-called Anthropocene Epoch, around 11,700 years ago (which is when the Agricultural Revolution began, 12,000-15,000 years ago), humans have effed it up to such an extent that we’ve managed to forecast the very end of life on earth...  This is no exaggeration... I wish it were, but it is not. On this very subject, Thomas McMullan’s words are depressing (8): “In May [2018] an analysis estimated that 83 per cent of wild mammals have been lost since the rise of human civilisation. Other studies have warned that the planet is facing “biological annihilation” at the hands of humansa sixth mass extinction is already underway.”
     To put it quite bluntly, we humans are in charge of our own extinction. We are primates who have somehow tricked ourselves into thinking that we are not part of the natural order of things. The amount of death and destruction that humans have managed to wreak on planet earth and all of its life forms in such a short time frame is truly impressive. Is this it? Is the end near? Does the Anthropocene Epoch represent the countdown to ‘biological annihilation’? It appears that it does.


     So then, what exactly does that make Homo sapiens? What sense can we give humanity in light of our particular role as the harbingers of doomsday? Is there any hope? What is our reason for our existence? Can human life truly have any meaning, or is it devoid of any real purpose? What’s next for us primates?  A national ban on single use plastic? Continuing to reduce our environmental footprint? Recycling? To stop clear-cutting forests? To stop overfishing? Stop eating meat? Supporting the Wet’suwet’en anti-pipeline camp? Making ethical choices... It’s a start.  


______________________________________________________________________

About the author: Paul D. LeBlanc is dedicated to the study of culture, language and the origins of writing in the ancient world. He holds a master's degree in Religious Studies from the University of Ottawa, in the same city where he currently lives with his wife, two daughters, and his cat. He is the author of Deciphering the Proto-Sinaitic Script: Making Sense of the Wadi el-Hol and Serabit el-Khadim Early Alphabetic Inscriptions (2018). For more on this book, click http://protosinaiticscript.blogspot.com/2018/03/deciphering-proto-sinaitic-script-about.html

Notes:
(5) “Plastic pollution crisis: How waste ends up in our oceans” By Emanuela Campanella, Global News Toronto, June 17, 2018. https://globalnews.ca/news/4269163/plastic-pollution-waste-ocean/
(7) “World's mammals being eaten into extinction, report warns” by Damian Carrington, The Guardian, 19 Oct. 2016

Image credits:
(1) Primate skulls: Primate_skull_series_with_legend.png Molecular Insights into Human Brain Evolution, Jane Bradbury, PLoS Biology Vol. 3, No. 3, e50 doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0030050 Author: Primate_skull_series_with_legend.png: Christopher Walsh, Harvard Medical School (via Wikimedia Commons), made available with the Creative Commons Attribution 2.5 Generic license.
(2) Homo erectus skull. Mafnoor (user), via Pixabay. https://pixabay.com/en/homo-erectus-skull-ancestor-2242425/
(3) Tarsier tarsius image. Author: Sakurai Midori (via Wikimedia Commons) File:Tarsier Tarsius sp.jpg, made available under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported license.
(4) Lemur catta image. Author: Yves Picq (via Wikimedia Commons), File:Lemurien 1006a.JPG, made available under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported license.
(5) Chimpanzee. Author: Alexas_Fotos, via Pixabay.com
(6) Forensic reconstruction of Homo habilis, , exhibit in LWL-Museum für Archäologie, Herne, Germany (2007 photograph). Reconstruction by W. Schnaubelt & N. Kieser (Atelier WILD LIFE ART) Photographed by User:Lillyundfreya (via Wikimedia Commons) - Photographed at Westfälisches Museum für Archäologie, Herne. File:Homo habilis.JPG, CC BY-SA 3.0
(7) Industry. From cwizner (user), via Pixabay.com
(8) Nuclear power (pic of a nuclear weapons test). From WikiImages (user). https://pixabay.com/en/nuclear-weapons-test-nuclear-weapon-67557/
(9) Plastic waste. From MikesPhotos (user), via Pixabay.com
(10) Toronto skyline. From brigachtal (user), via Pixabay.com
(11) Oil sands, Fort McMurray, Alberta. Author: eryn.rickard. Source: Flickr: Oilsands1, via Wikimedia Commons (dated 11 November 2010).
(12) Deforestation. From ChadoNihi (user), via Pixabay.com
(13) Mandril. From gefun (user), via Pixabay.com
(14) Geological time spiral. From skeeze (user), via Pixabay.com









Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Acadian Prehistory: From Medieval Religion, the Angevin Empire... and leaving Poitou behind

Some of the first Europeans who crossed the Atlantic and settled onto North America's distant shores, at the beginning of the 17th century, came from France. Having allied themselves with the five Algonquian-speaking Nations of the Wabanaki Confederacy (composed of the Mi'kmaq, Maliseet, Passamaquoddy, Abenaki and Penobscot), these early French settlers intermarried and adopted local Amerindian customs "du pays" (native customs) and the land they inhabited, corresponding mostly to present-day Nova Scotia, would be known as La Cadie or l'Acadie - Acadia - and its inhabitants the Acadiens (Acadians) and later known as Cadiens (Cajuns) in Louisiana. Most of these early French settlers that formed the "first families" of Acadia came primarily from the Poitou, Aunis and Saintonge regions of western France. In fact, since the vast majority of these new settlers originated from Poitou, the Acadian French language of today still preserves most of the arch

"The Road on High" Virtual Book Launch for a Virtually Unknown Author... Moi

For those of you who know me well, my love for the written word is certainly not a secret. Although I do not pretend to possess any extraordinary writing skills, I do however take great joy when it comes time to putting a couple of words down, pen to paper, and attempt to smite out whatever scraps of a made-up story that's been lingering in my mind, tormenting me. Welcome to the world of fiction. When I write, (and on this point I am quite sure all writers and artists will strongly agree) I find it is a mental exercise that is simultaneously both relaxing and stressful, a sort of challenge of spirit or a personal quest upon which, when one embarks, a person can easily fall prey to the developing world of the story - of the art - that slowly steals you away from reality. At times the words or visions come easily, yet during others they do not simply come to you, but rather they reveal themselves like so many thoughts channeled through your psyche. In a way, it is as though they

Aryan Culture and Language: A Possible Candidate for the Linguistic Identity of the Indus Civilization and Script

A brief foreword... The article which follows is largely taken from my M.A. thesis work which is entitled "Indus Epigraphic Perspectives: Exploring Past Decipherment Attempts & Possible New Approaches" (c) 2012 Paul D. LeBlanc, Ottawa (Canada). While it is unpublished, it is still important for you as a reader to be aware that I, as the author of this work, do still retain all the intellectual copyrights over it as my property (except where otherwise indicated). Although, if you are interested in quoting from it for your own scholarly purposes, you may do so, but with the provision that you source your information properly. You simply have to include me in your bibliography as follows: LeBlanc, Paul D. "Aryan Culture and Language: A Possible Candidate for the Linguistic Identity of the Indus Civilization and Script." The Inquestia Times. Online article made available by author, dated Dec. 2012. http://inquestiatimes.blogspot.ca/ With this bein